Improved clinical outcomes after revision arthroplasty with a hinged implant for severely stiff total knee arthroplasty
Paul J. H. van Rensch,corresponding author1 Petra J. C. Heesterbeek,1 Gerjon Hannink,2 Gijs G. van Hellemondt,1 and Ate B. Wymenga1Knee
Purpose
Management of the severely stiff total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging, with the outcome of revision arthroplasty being inferior compared to the outcome for other indications. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome after revision TKA with hinged-type implants for severely stiff TKA [range of motion (ROM) ≤ 70°] at 2 years.
Methods
A cohort of 38 patients with a hinged-type revision TKA (Waldemar Link or RT-Plus) and preoperative ROM ≤ 70° were selected from a prospectively collected database. ROM, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction and Knee Society Score (KSS) were obtained preoperatively and at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years. Pre- and postoperative outcome were compared at 2 years.
Results
There was a significant increase in ROM and KSS. VAS pain scores did not differ significantly. The median ROM at 2 years was 90° (range 50°–125°) with a median gain of 45° (range 5°–105°). Median VAS pain was 28.5 (range 0–96) points and median VAS satisfaction was 72 (range 0–100) points at 2 years. Twelve patients suffered a complication. Recurrent stiff knee was the most frequently reported complication (n = 5).
Conclusions
Hinged-type revision TKA following a severely stiff TKA renders a significant, although moderate, clinical improvement at 2 years.
Level of evidence
Retrospective case series. Level IV.
Link to article