Association Between Serum Testosterone Levels and Cutibacterium Skin Load in Patients Undergoing Elective Shoulder Arthroplasty
Corey J. Schiffman, MD, 1 Jason E. Hsu, MD, 1 Kevin J. Khoo, BS, 2 Anastasia Whitson, BSPH, 1 Jie J. Yao, MD, 1 John C. Wu, MD, 1 and Frederick A. Matsen, III, MD 1 ,aShoulder
Cutibacterium periprosthetic joint infections are important complications of shoulder arthroplasty. Although it is known that these infections are more common among men and that they are more common in patients with high levels of Cutibacterium on the skin, the possible relationship between serum testosterone levels and skin Cutibacterium levels has not been investigated.
Methods:
In 51 patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasties, total serum testosterone, free testosterone, and sex hormone binding globulin levels obtained in the clinic before the surgical procedure were compared with the levels of Cutibacterium on the skin in clinic, on the skin in the operating room prior to the surgical procedure, and on the dermal wound edge of the incised skin during the surgical procedure.
Results:
Clinic skin Cutibacterium loads were strongly associated with both clinic free testosterone levels (tau, 0.569; p < 0.001) and total serum testosterone levels (tau, 0.591; p < 0.001). The prepreparation skin and wound Cutibacterium levels at the time of the surgical procedure were also significantly associated with both the clinic total serum testosterone levels (p < 0.001) and the clinic free testosterone levels (p < 0.03). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that serum testosterone was an independent predictor of high skin Cutibacterium loads, even when age and sex were taken into account. Patients taking supplemental testosterone had higher free testosterone levels and tended to have higher skin Cutibacterium loads. Patients who underwent the ream-and-run procedure had higher total and free testosterone levels and higher skin Cutibacterium loads.
Conclusions:
Testosterone levels are predictive of skin Cutibacterium levels in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. This relationship deserves further investigation both as a risk stratification tool and as a potential area for intervention in reducing shoulder periprosthetic joint infection.
Level of Evidence:
Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Link to article