The Journal of Arthroplasty, ISSN: 0883-5403, Vol: 36, Issue: 5, Page: 1746-1752

Alpha-Defensin Offers Limited Utility in Routine Workup of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Lindsay T. Kleeman-Forsthuber; Roseann M. Johnson; Anna C. Brady; Aviva K. Pollet; Douglas A. Dennis; Jason M. Jennings
Ankle Elbow Hip Knee Shoulder Wrist

Background

Alpha-defensin (AD) is a synovial biomarker included as a minor criterion in the scoring system for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study is to study the impact of AD on diagnosis and management of PJI.

Methods

Synovial fluid from 522 patients after total knee and hip arthroplasty was retrospective reviewed. Synovial white blood cell count, percentage of neutrophils, and culture from the AD immunoassay laboratory were reviewed with serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein values from our institution. A modified version of the 2018 scoring system for diagnosis of PJI was used, only scoring white blood cell count, percentage of neutrophils, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein. AD was then analyzed with these scores to determine if AD changed diagnostic findings or clinical management.

Results

Eight-two patients were categorized as “infected” (score ≥6), of which 76 patients had positive AD. Of the 6 “infected” patients with negative AD, 2 had positive cultures (Staphylococcus epidermidis). Two-hundred thirteen patients were diagnosed as “possibly infected” (score 2-5). Fourteen of these patients had positive AD, of which 5 had positive cultures assisting with the diagnosis. The AD test changed the diagnosis from “possibly infected” to “infected” in 8 patients (1.5%) but only altered treatment plan in 6 patients (1.1%). A score <2 (not infected) was calculated in 227 patients with no patients having positive AD.

Conclusion

AD may be beneficial in some cases where laboratory values are otherwise equivocal; however, its routine use for the diagnosis of PJI may not be warranted.

Link to article