Acta Orthopaedica, 85:5, 480-487, DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2014.940573

What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?

Kirill Gromov, Mounim Korchi, Morten G Thomsen, Henrik Husted & Anders Troelsen
Knee

Background — Surgeon-dependent factors such as optimal implant alignment are thought to play a significant role in outcome following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Exact definitions and references for optimal alignment are, however, still being debated. This overview of the literature describes different definitions of component alignment following primary TKA for (1) tibiofemoral alignment in the AP plane, (2) tibial and femoral component placement in the AP plane, (3) tibial and femoral component placement in the sagittal plane, and (4) rotational alignment of tibial and femoral components and their role in outcome and implant survival.

Methods — We performed a literature search for original and review articles on implant positioning following primary TKA. Definitions for coronal, sagittal, and rotational placement of femoral and tibial components were summarized and the influence of positioning on survival and functional outcome was considered.

Results — Many definitions exist when evaluating placement of femoral and tibial components. Implant alignment plays a role in both survival and functional outcome following primary TKA, as component malalignment can lead to increased failure rates, maltracking, and knee pain.

Interpretation — Based on currently available evidence, surgeons should aim for optimal alignment of tibial and femoral components when performing TKA.


Link to article