Osteoclastogenesis-Related Cytokines and Peri-Prosthetic Osteolysis in Revision Metal-On-Metal Total Hip Replacements: The Work Was Presented at the 11th European Hip Society Congress; October 11, 2014, Stockholm, Sweden. Awarded Prize for Best Oral Presentation. HIP International. 2015;25(4):355-360.

Osteoclastogenesis-Related Cytokines and Peri-Prosthetic Osteolysis in Revision Metal-On-Metal Total Hip Replacements: The Work Was Presented at the 11th European Hip Society Congress; October 11, 2014, Stockholm, Sweden. Awarded Prize for Best Oral Presentation

Eastwood SE, John A, Jones SA, et al.

Hip

Purpose

Peri-prosthetic osteolysis is a major cause for revision hip arthroplasty; various cytokines including those in the osteoclastogenesis pathway have been identified as potentially key in the osteolysis process. Adverse reactions to metal debris in metal-on-metal total hip replacements have led to an increase in revision procedures. This study examines the levels of osteoclastogenesis-related cytokines in serum and synovial fluid samples obtained from patients at the time of revision metal-on-metal total hip replacement and compares between patients with and without radiographic evidence of peri-prosthetic osteolysis.

Methods

Sandwich ELISA techniques were used to detect IL-6, IL-18, M-CSF, sRANKL and OPG in the samples. Results were analysed with linear regression, Fisher’s tests and t-tests; p<0.05 considered significant. Samples from 36 patients (18 with osteolysis, 18 without osteolysis) were analysed.

Results

There was wide variation in the detectable levels of cytokines. No significant differences were found between patients with and without osteolysis in mean synovial fluid levels of IL-6 (p = 0.863), IL-18 (p = 0.324), M-CSF (p = 0.508), sRANKL (p = 0.884), OPG (p = 0.776) or mean serum levels of OPG (p = 0.993) or sRANKL (p = 0.565) (insufficient detection of IL-6, IL-18 or M-CSF in serum samples). A correlation was found between synovial fluid levels of IL-6 and OPG in patients without osteolysis (r² = 0.618, p<0.001) but not with osteolysis (r² = 0.0004).

Conclusions

These results indicate that the process of peri-prosthetic osteolysis is complex and multifactorial; there may also be an influence of metallosis. Further research is needed to increase understanding of peri-prosthetic osteolysis and influence clinical practice.

Link to article