Good quality of life outcomes after treatment of prosthetic joint infection with debridement and prosthesis retentionCraig Aboltins Michelle Dowsey Trish Peel Wen K. Lim Peter Choong
Ankle Elbow Hip Knee Shoulder Wrist
Patients treated for early prosthetic joint infection (PJI) with surgical debridement and prosthesis retention have a rate of successful infection eradication that is similar to patients treated with the traditional approach of prosthesis exchange. It is therefore important to consider other outcomes after prosthetic joint infection treatment that may influence management decisions, such as quality of life (QOL). Our aim was to describe infection cure rates and quality of life for patients with prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement and prosthesis retention and to determine if treatment with this approach was a risk factor for poor quality of life outcomes. Prospectively collected pre and post‐arthroplasty data were available for 2,134 patients, of which PJI occurred in 41. For patients treated for prosthetic joint infection, the 2‐year survival free of treatment failure was 87% (95%CI 84–89). Prosthetic joint infection cases treated with debridement and retention had a similar improvement from pre‐arthroplasty to 12‐months post‐arthroplasty as patients without PJI in QOL according to the SF–12 survey. Prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement and retention was not a risk factor for poor quality of life on univariate or multivariate analysis. Prosthetic joint infection treated with debridement and prosthesis retention results in good cure rates and quality of life. Further studies are required that directly compare quality of life for different surgical approaches for prosthetic joint infection to better inform management decisions.